JUDGING SCORECARD - HOUSE: MULTI-ASSETS
"
*
" indicates required fields
Step
1
of
6
16%
TID
*
Juror ID
*
Pillar 1. Investment Process: To examine the principles and the team’s investment style and consistencies, accountability, and investor alignment
Please rate the strategy's Investment Process capability by their strength:
Ambiguous
Not Really
Somewhat
Quite Good
Excellent
The philosophy is appropriate for target investors
The process and styles are consistently applied
The team takes accountability for style drifts seriously
Has a solid ESG integration process
ESG is considered a material impact for investment and divestment consequences
Comments for investment philosophy, style & process
Strengths
Areas for Improvements
Pillar 2. Portfolio construction: To examine the portfolio disciplines, liquidity capability, investment/ divestment principles, and research resources
Please rate the strategy's Investment and Divestment Discipline below:
Ambiguous
Poor
Acceptable
Somewhat Robust
Extremely Robust
ESG factors and characteristics
Portfolio weights are decided in line with objectives
Liquidity is taken seriously for normal and stressed market conditions
The rationale behind selection and divestment decisions
Research resources and depth
Comments for investment and divestment discipline
Strengths
Areas for Improvements
Pillar 3. Performance & risk: To examine how alpha sources, performances, and risks are generated, single investor diversification, net returns above Benchmark, drawdowns, and recovery, and stress testing.
Please rate the strategy's Risk Management performance below:
Ambiguous
Not Really
Acceptable
Very Good
Extremely Robust
Risk management is closely integrated into the investment process
Performance is achieved without taking on additional risks
Risk management is taken seriously firm-wise from top down to within each team
Conditions are imposed on investor limit and diversification
ESG as an integral part of risk and portfolio management
Comments for risk management performance
Strengths
Areas for Improvements
Pillar 4. Stewardship: To examine the manager’s engagement disclosure, a signatory to stewardship principles, engagement frequency, responsible shareholding policies, and implementation, stewardship engagement and monitoring, and voting disclosures
Please rate the strategy's Stewardship and Investor Protection quality below:
Ambiguous
Not Really
Acceptable
Very Good
Extremely Robust
Investor protection is closely integrated into the investment process
The team takes accountability, integrity, transparency seriously
The team takes an active approach for investees engagement and monitoring
Has a comprehensive Disclosure policy for Engagement and Voting
Is a good steward and takes responsible shareholding and active ownership seriously
Comments for investor protection and stewardship
Strengths
Areas for Improvements
Pillar 5. Corporate Quality: To examine the company's commitment to responsible stewardship while ensuring healthy and sustainable growth
Please rate the Corporate Quality and Strength below. If you have rated this pillar for the same company before, you may skip this section.
Ambiguous
Not Really
Acceptable
Very Good
Extremely Robust
The firm takes responsible investing and transparency seriously
The firm has a robust governance oversight and implementation
The company embraces risk management addressing all fronts
The firm is growing healthily from organic AUM acqusition and investment gains
The firm undertakes Voting and Engagement Disclosure open and transparent
Comments for corporate quality and strength
Strengths
Areas for Improvements
Please give an Overall Score below:
All factors considered, how would you rate this investment strategy and its execution? Please score below: (0: lowest; 10: highest)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Overall comment
If you would like to receive a copy of your scorecard, please enter your email below: