Dear fellow Jurors,
Thank you for offering your precious time in helping to assess the candidates’ strategies.
Before Scoring, please read this first:-
- Would you please make sure you have your Judging ID put on to each scorecard? Your ID is next to your name on your private portal.
- We have prepared comparison data for each pillar so that you can see everything at a glance among the candidates. We encourage you to refer to the compartment while you’re judging the respective pillar.
- Everything is on one page now, so you don’t have to search from different folders, and the scorecard is on the right so that you can scroll along when you’re finished with one pillar and go to the next.
- As always, your written comments, whether pillar by a pillar or one overall comment, are highly appreciated and would help the candidates become better.
- If you are joining us at The Gatekeeper Forum, please save Scoring until after the session.
- Unfortunately, you cannot save your work for later, and therefore, once you’ve started scoring a company, you’ll have to finish. You can come back later to score for another company later.
- You DO NOT have to score Pillar 5 again after giving your score once to the same company during judging.
- For categories with more than 3 participants, please select a minimum of three candidates whom you think are worthy of your time and whom you think should be on the top 3 for the Best-in-Class title for scoring and comments. Your shortlisting basis could be based on return performance, ESG or other indicators you feel are most important. The button “COMPARE STRATEGIES” on the category page will give you the quantitative data you need for comparisons over the four pillars.
Pillar 1. Investment process
To examine the principles and the team’s investment style and consistencies, accountability, and investor alignment
Pillar 2. Portfolio construction
To examine the portfolio disciplines, liquidity capability, investment/ divestment principles, and research resources
Pillar 3. Performance & Risk
To examine how performances and risks are generated, net returns together with drawdowns and recovery and investor diversification
Pillar 4. Stewardship
To examine the manager’s commitment to engagement and disclosure, responsible shareholding policies, and driving changes for investees
Pillar 5. Corporate Quality
To examine the company's commitment to responsible stewardship while ensuring healthy and sustainable growth
Fact Sheets and Reports:
Shaojun CAI , Portfolio Manager, International Fixed Income
E Fund Management
Category: Global Fixed Income
- Leo Lee, CIO, Grace Harmony (Hong Kong) Limited
- Peter Ryan-Kane, Founder, PeRK Advisory
- Elsa Pau, CEO, WealthAsia Group
Fact Sheets and Reports:
How are the bonds selected? Please could we have some additional information for the selection process?
Credit research plays a substantial part of the investment process. Once macro-driven ideas are generated, more traditional fundamental analysis is completed at the company level. Understanding the business, dissecting the company financials, and determining a relative value metric are all considered prior to any buying decision (bond selection) being made.
The team evaluates and selects individual securities as follows:
1. Corporate Debt – We assess the business risks and prospects of issuers and score credits based on the following metrics:
– the quality of a company’s earnings in relation to management’s goals and risk tolerance
– any specific issuer bond covenants
– the position of an issue within the capital structure
– the value and range of the firm’s assets across the respective capital structure
2. Sovereign Debt – One of the key differentiators of the Fund is our active approach to duration management and our ability to add value through these selection decisions. While our duration positioning has been additive to performance, we have also exhibited strong downside protection by tactically adding safe-haven duration during times of stress. Sovereign debt decisions are determined by gaining a full understanding of the following factors:
– real interest rates (both short-term and long-term) – We prefer real interest rates to be attractive relative to prevailing macro conditions.
– political/economic conditions – We prefer that fiscal and monetary policy are being conducted in a manner that supports growth without overstimulating inflation
3. Securitized – A structured deal library is used to narrow down prospective securitized deals in specific sectors. The goal is to seek high loss-adjusted yields and absolute return with a high margin of safety as well as identify securities with pricing anomalies due to various dislocations, idiosyncratic situations, and unusual market technicals. In-depth analysis into deal collaterals is performed to calibrate the assumption input for our valuation model and stress tests, which in turn help us select the most attractive tranche of the capital stack in terms of risk/reward. We also assess correlations with other asset classes to determine the right degree of concentration commensurate the team’s conviction and macroeconomic outlook.
The Fund will often concentrate the number of securities to a more limited number than typical industry averages for multi-sector portfolios. This curated approach to security selection provides the Fund with an additional source of alpha. Position sizes are conviction-weighted and consider expected return, the probability of achieving that return, volatility considerations, intra-portfolio correlations, and liquidity considerations.
Brian Kloss , PM
Reina Berlien , Head of ESG
Franklin Templeton Investments
Category: Global Fixed Income
1. Jonathan Lim
2. Luiza Lee
- Alvin Ma, Managing Director, Axiom Investment Management
- Catherine Chen, Founder & CEO , AvantFaire Investment Management Limited
- Wyman Leung, Chief Investment Officer, AMG Financial Group Ltd
- Janet Li, Wealth Business Leader, Asia, Mercer